return elements that match specified CSS selector(s)

Why might one prefer using querySelectorAll() over getElementsByTagName()?

Answers:

  • There are several reasons one might prefer using querySelectorAll() over getElementsByTagName():

    1. CSS Selector Syntax: querySelectorAll() allows you to use CSS selectors, which are more powerful and flexible than the simple tag name filtering used by getElementsByTagName(). With querySelectorAll(), you can easily select elements based on classes, attributes, IDs, or combinations thereof.

      // Example of a more complex selection
      const elements = document.querySelectorAll('div.some-class[data-attribute="value"]');
      
    2. Static NodeList: querySelectorAll() returns a static NodeList, meaning that it does not change if the document is updated or elements are added or removed. In contrast, getElementsByTagName() returns a live HTMLCollection, which automatically updates as the document changes. This can lead to unexpected behavior if you are iterating over the collection and the DOM changes.

    3. Readability and Maintainability: Using querySelectorAll() can make your code easier to read and maintain, as the syntax is closer to how web developers typically write CSS. This can help in quickly understanding the selections being made.

    4. Multiple Criteria: With querySelectorAll(), you can combine multiple selection criteria (like class, id, attributes) in a single query:

      const items = document.querySelectorAll('ul > li.active, ul > li.selected');
      

      With getElementsByTagName(), you'd need to make multiple calls and combine the results manually.

    5. No Need for Filtering: When you need to filter elements based on more complex criteria, querySelectorAll() can directly provide the required elements using a single call rather than filtering through a collection returned from getElementsByTagName().

    Summary

    In summary, querySelectorAll() provides more flexibility, a more readable syntax based on CSS selectors, and avoids the complications of live collections, making it a preferred choice for many developers when selecting DOM elements.

Related Questions: